|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
| Selurtsirata wrote ... | 2003-09-23 20:48:03 | | I loved this title, superb graphics and gameplay. Can anyone remember the flies in the screen, i can recall my mam trying to squatt them, genius touch | | Trg wrote ... | 2003-01-18 11:13:29 | | P.Pirates disk 91.
| | Jason West wrote ... | 2002-01-21 11:44:47 | | i think this was one of the best games ever written, it showed what could be done with a simple idea and a bit of coding skill. this game was never out of my ST, the time and pratice it took to beat jimmy meant this game had loads of repeat play and the comic touches on the balls just added to the overall package, 10 out of 10 | | bazfan wrote ... | 2002-01-15 18:24:26 | | i dont disagree matt, i too think the pool version was hell of a lot better than snooker. games were shorter, rules were easier, so 5/10 , yes i agree | | bazfan wrote ... | 2002-01-15 18:23:03 | | i dont disagree matt, i too think the pool version was hell of a lot better than snooker. games were shorter, rules were easier, so 5/10 , yes i agree | | Matt Taylor wrote ... | 2001-11-08 09:09:00 | | I could never get my head round this title. Sure, the graphincs were ground breaking and the comic value of the game broke new ground with its superb animations, but the lacklustre and tedious gameplay had me snoring way too quickly. The pool version of this is so much better (and shorter)
An easier learning curve would've benefitted the title so much. A real shame, but no doubt some of you disagree.
5/10
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
